In "Colorblindness is the New Racism," Margalynne Armstrong and Stephanie Wildman argue that by departing from the privileged perspective of pretending to be "colorblind" and utilizing the framework and vocabulary of color insight, people will be able to engage in the deeper converations necessary to understand the function of race and privilege in the larger world. Their arguments are buttressed and supported by Mellody Hobson, as she builds on their ideas to discuss the incredible impact that can occur when these conversations happen. Whether finding a vaccine for smallpox or building the worldwide leader in sports, I thought Hobson's examples helped transition this topic to the opportunity cost of failing to find a space of color insight.
At the beginning of the text, Armstrong and Wildman emphasize the failures of a colorblind mindset. They state that failing to name and examine whiteness, whether in a classroom or a courtroom, obscures the operation of privilege. The quote that stands out to me is “The dominant norm of colorblindness obscures and maintains that status quo of white privilege.” They argue that the solution to this problem would be to teach how to analyze privilege in different spaces.
Building on their rebuttal of colorblindness, Armstrong and Wildman describe how color insight can build a vocabulary for teaching across racial lines. While their examples infer an older group of students, Hobson’s example stays with me. She notes that as a four year old her mother was determined to present the world as it is, baring the dark truths of neighborhood bias, Santa Claus, and the impact that racial bias can have on a life.
Both the text and video note that being informed about systemic inequity is necessary, productive and realistic. Hobson claims that it left her thinking that she could do anything. She even notes that it created a lifelong work ethic. I wonder if this would be true of many four-year-olds, or whether Hobson's clearly dedicated and encouraging mother was a necessary support as she navigated the grimmer realities of the world. It kept me thinking about institutional conditions that need to exist in support of this educational practice.
In the examples of educational techniques to foster color insight towards the end of the text, I found myself thinking a great deal about Melody Hobson's points regarding diverse environments being the strongest environments. Think about the color line activity in a wealthy Rhode Island classroom. How isolating would it be to be one or two students in that classroom who consistently circle "below the line" attributes? Would you have created a hostile environment for a small number of students for the benefit of their privileged counterparts? I think you could make the argument that these types of educational practices need to be incorporated only after the school has really considered how this is a holistic practice, rather than isolated lessons.
Hi Tom!
ReplyDeleteWhen I read the phrase "opportunity cost" in your first paragraph, it struck me as something that I had been looking for but hadn't been able to find. Thank you for putting words to that concept for me!
I was struck by the situation you brought up with a class doing the power line activity in an affluent town in Rhode Island, especially since I grew up in Lincoln and saw similar conversations start, especially in honors and AP classes, where most of the students were middle- or upper-middle-class and white. While I wouldn't say that these conversations created an outright hostile environment, they were definitely uncomfortable and often created a bit of a divide.
I plan on taking the Ray Rickman and Stages of Freedom resource and making a link for it on my school's ClassDojo because I had never heard of this organization, and I'm sure that many of the families in my school could benefit from it. Thank you!
" ...at some point, waiting for systemic change doesn't work." YES!!! This statement resonated with me so much, I think a lot of the people who acknowledge race without actively making racial discrimination and bias worse or better are waiting for change to happen. Many people, if not the majority, think that change is not their responsibility. To be honest, this is the easiest type or thinking to fall into, it's easier to say that something or the treatment of a group of people are not your responsibility to change. But just like you highlight, there comes a point where complacency is doing harm.
ReplyDeleteI think a lot about activities like the color line and how risky they can be in spaces where people can be called OUT in negative ways or be made to feel less than. My own participation in a class that is racially and socioeconomically diverse can also be revealing in good ways but also troubling ones if my own privileged gets spotlighted as a form of power rather than self-reflection. And thanks for sharing the swimming resource!!
ReplyDelete